Make better decisions, faster

Parallelize your group discussions
with AI-orchestrated communication

Get Started Sign In

Should we implement remote work permanently?

2 participants activeConnected

Copy invitation link

AI Facilitator10:43 AM

...leaving room to work out specific details like the number of days.

AI Facilitator10:44 AM

Take a look at the statement below and let me know - do you agree with this as a direction forward?

Proposed consensus10:44 AM

We should implement a permanent hybrid work policy that combines remote and in-office work. This preserves flexibility and work-life balance while maintaining opportunities for in-person collaboration. The specific structure—including the balance between remote and in-office days—should be determined through further discussion.

10:51 AMYou

This sounds reasonable. I agree.

AI Facilitator10:51 AM

Thank you, David! I appreciate your agreement with this direction. We're now working to ensure all participants are aligned on this hybrid approach. I'll keep you updated as we finalize the details with the full group.

Consensus Reached!10:51 AM

We should implement a permanent hybrid work policy that combines remote and in-office work. This preserves flexibility and work-life balance while maintaining opportunities for in-person collaboration. The specific structure—including the balance between remote and in-office days—should be determined through further discussion.

Traditional meetings are fundamentally inefficient

The way groups have communicated for millennia suffers from a fundamental flaw: we can only have one conversation at a time. This means our discussions are:

Serialized

One person speaks at a time. As you add more participants, meetings take longer and longer.

Broadcast

Everyone hears the same information, whether or not that's what's most valuable to them.

Long-running meetingsDelayed decisionsFrustrated participants

AI enables a new paradigm

Unlike humans, AIs can have multiple conversations at once while retaining full context across those conversations.

With Chord, each participant has a one-on-one conversation with an AI facilitator, and the facilitator routes relevant information between participants in real time. This means discussions are:

Parallelized

Everyone speaks to the facilitator at the same time, making full use of everyone's bandwidth.

Personalized

Each person is fully engaged, focusing on what they have to share, and what they need to know.

Less time in meetingsRicher shared contextBetter decisions

How it works

1

Create a new discussion and share the link

Tell Chord what decision your team needs to make or what topic you’re trying to get to consensus on. Share the discussion link with your team, for example, in your Zoom or Meet chat.

2

Everyone chats one-on-one with Chord, in parallel

Each participant joins the discussion and shares their thoughts with Chord in a one-on-one chat. Chord tailors its questions to each participant to understand their context and perspectives.

3

Chord helps the group resolve disagreements and establish consensus

Chord routes relevant information and perspectives between the participants. Everyone stays focused on the aspects of the discussion most relevant to them.

4

Chord produces a consensus statement as a record of the decision

Each participant explicitly endorses the consensus, or the discussion continues to resolve any remaining disagreements.

Chord

The platform for orchestrated communication

Get Started